Resultant wrong

I am used to perceiving my actions as either a priori wrong or a resultant wrong. How does it work? A priori wrong action is when you think that some action you are going to take will be wrong. Because your experience tells you that you have previously done the same thing and…”everything went according to plan”.

A resultantly wrong action is an action that you did, but as it turned out in the end – you did it in vain/wrong. But you still tried to change something. This is an action about change.

I described the situation, the feelings. The order and reason for the actions. In my opinion, a person should understand “what they got themselves into”. And think about why they had all this. But it’s easier to give a person this choice than to remain silent. Because I’m used to being silent, coordinating in my head the train of thoughts of the other half. As if I’m sitting in someone’s head.

Previously, I would have perceived this as a wrong move. But now I just wanted to close this issue without half measures, because it would be harder for myself. There are certain parallels to communication with Daria here. Maybe they are not so deep, but on a higher level than usual. In general, I am still surprised by people who talk about their thoughts and feelings. More often than not, only I do it. Others are silent. But I get tired of “reading minds”, or, rather, drawing up my vision of other people’s thoughts. Therefore, it’s easier when you just talk to a person about what you feel, what they feel. And there it will be as it will be.

Creative people are complex in their own way. And people like me are also sick, in a certain sense. Or not even in a certain sense. In any case, it didn’t get any worse. So…so.